Vol. 1 · No. 4/ Monday 28 September 2026/ Published in Melbourne, Australia/ Independent · No broadcast rights · No affiliate links

MATSIDE

The grappling paper of record — Asia & Oceania desk matside.com.au
The Roll Call Everyone this desk has on the record.  
Competitor—
Division—
Event—
Result—
Wollongong · kids divisions 186 matches contested, 0 with a method on the record
DIVISIONS93
COMPETITORS196
BYES27

Correction, 27 October 2026: the figure above is wrong. The organiser published a method for all 186 contests, not 0. See Corrections below.

The Record · AFBJJ Wollongong Open · The Snakepit Stadium, Gwynneville

How They Won Is Not Recorded

On Sunday, 196 children competed in 93 divisions at Wollongong. One hundred and eighty-six matches were contested. The published record names the winner of every one of them and says how not one of them was won.

Correction, 27 October 2026: the headline and central claim of this article are wrong. The organiser published a method for every one of the 186 contests. See Corrections below.

The AFBJJ Wollongong Open ran on Sunday at The Snakepit Stadium in Gwynneville, on four mats, from nine in the morning. This desk recorded the kids divisions: ninety-three brackets, 196 competitors, 213 places in the draw. Twenty-seven of those places were byes. The remaining 186 were matches, and every bracket closed.

Not one of the 186 carries a method. Not a submission, not a points score, not an advantage, not a referee decision. The published bracket gives two names and a line through one of them.

A result tells you who advanced. A method tells you what happened. The register can now say that Leo Levsen beat Kai Commins in a six-year-old's final at −25kg. It cannot say whether the boy won by armbar or by a single advantage in overtime.

That is not a failure of the bracket app. Smoothcomp carries the field; the organiser fills it, or does not. At Carrara in June the same platform published submissions and times. At Kraków this month it published inside heel hook and triangle armlock against the men's −66kg final. At Wollongong on Sunday the field is empty in all ninety-three kids divisions this desk read.

Seventy-six of those divisions published a placing table, so first, second and both bronzes are on the record. The other seventeen published no placings at all, and for those we have entered the result of the final and nothing beyond it. Where a bracket does not say who came third, this paper does not decide it.

The consequence is small this week and large in five years. A parent looking up a nine-year-old's first gold will find the opponent's name, the academy, the weight and the date. The child will remember a choke or a scramble that went the right way with eleven seconds left. The register will hold the fact and not the sport.

We have recorded what was published and left the method column empty rather than fill it from memory, from a phone held at mat-side, or from a video posted afterwards. An empty column is a true statement about the record. An inferred one is not.

What we are asking for. Method and time are entered on the mat, by officials who already have the tablet in their hands, and they cost nothing to publish. We are asking AFBJJ and Grappling Bros to publish both. Where this desk is at the event, we will record them ourselves and mark them as our own observation rather than the official record — the two are not the same thing and will not be mixed.

The ninety-three divisions are now at matside.com.au/brackets/, one permanent address each, searchable by competitor, academy, division and event. They will not be moved and they will not be deleted.

The Long Match · Wollongong

The division a child entered on Wednesday did not exist on Sunday

When late registration closed, the kids categories at Wollongong held 136 divisions and 235 entries. Seventy-nine of those divisions contained one child. A division with one child in it is not a competition, and no organiser can run it as one.

On Sunday morning the 136 were merged, split and recut into 93 brackets holding 213 places and 196 competitors. Two were run as round-robins rather than knockouts. One put boys and girls in a single bracket, at white belt, nine years old, under 30.20kg. Forty-two were settled by a single match. Seven had no match in them at all.

That is the ordinary arithmetic of a one-day event, and it is not a complaint. What matters here is what it does to a record. The division a parent registers into — a belt, an age, a weight — is a request. The division a child stands in is the answer, and the two are frequently not the same thing. A register built from the entry list would file the request and call it the result.

This desk builds it from the brackets as published on the day. That is why the ninety-three addresses carry the division as it was actually fought, at the weight and belt the organiser recut it to, and why the number of competitors here does not match the number of entries.

The seven unopposed children are the hard case. Four of the seven appear in a published placing table as first place. Three appear in none. Same situation on the day, two different records at the end of it, and neither is an error — there was no match to record. We have entered all seven as the brackets have them: a place in a division, no match, no method. We have not promoted the three and we have not demoted the four. The register can say that a child was there, in a division, with nobody across from them. It should say exactly that, and stop.

Wollongong, kids divisions, as the brackets closed

AFBJJ Wollongong Open · The Snakepit Stadium, Gwynneville · 27 September 2026

Ninety-three brackets recorded from the organiser's published draw and results, read on 28 September. Adult, master and juvenile divisions are not in this week's register. Kept permanently, corrected in place. Every bracket, searchable →

The recordCountNote
Divisions9371 gi · 22 no-gi
Competitors19636 academies
Places in the draw213Every bracket closed
Matches contested18627 places filled by bye
With a method or score0No submission, points, advantage or decision published
Placings published76First, second and both bronzes on the record
Final only17No placing table published; the final result is recorded and nothing beyond it
Decided by one match42One match contested, and the bracket closed
No match at all7One child entered, nobody across from them
Run as a round-robin2Not a knockout draw; recorded as a match log, not a tree

The bracket

AFBJJ Wollongong BJJ Open 2026 · Wollongong · 27 September 2026
Rounds resolve in the order they were fought
ROUND OF 16 QUARTERFINALS SEMIFINALS FINAL Harlan Brandigampala Leonidas Materac Points · 0–2 · adv 0–1 · pen 0–1 · 03:00 Cooper Luck† —† John Simitsiotis† —† Alexander Tsang† —† Hunter Adams Charbel Tadros Submission · 0–2 · 00:42 Kingsford Dodd† —† Matthew Younes† —† Joshua Sooho Moon† —† Leonidas Materac Cooper Luck Submission · 2–0 · 02:32 John Simitsiotis Alexander Tsang Points · 4–2 · adv 3–0 · pen 0–1 · 03:00 Charbel Tadros Kingsford Dodd Submission · 0–0 · 00:10 Matthew Younes Joshua Sooho Moon Submission · 0–0 · 00:26 Leonidas Materac John Simitsiotis Submission · 2–0 · 01:33 Kingsford Dodd Joshua Sooho Moon Submission · 0–0 · 00:30 Leonidas Materac Kingsford Dodd Submission · 0–0 · 00:01 CHAMPION Kingsford Dodd 2nd · Leonidas Materac 3rd · John Simitsiotis 3rd · Joshua Sooho Moon 5th · Alexander Tsang 5th · Charbel Tadros 5th · Cooper Luck 5th · Matthew Younes 9th · Hunter Adams 9th · Harlan Brandigampala
RoundMatchMethod
R16Leonidas Materac def. Harlan BrandigampalaPoints · 0–2 · adv 0–1 · pen 0–1 · 03:00
R16Cooper Luck — bye
Bye — no match contested.
No match
R16John Simitsiotis — bye
Bye — no match contested.
No match
R16Alexander Tsang — bye
Bye — no match contested.
No match
R16Charbel Tadros def. Hunter AdamsSubmission · 0–2 · 00:42
R16Kingsford Dodd — bye
Bye — no match contested.
No match
R16Matthew Younes — bye
Bye — no match contested.
No match
R16Joshua Sooho Moon — bye
Bye — no match contested.
No match
QFLeonidas Materac def. Cooper LuckSubmission · 2–0 · 02:32
QFJohn Simitsiotis def. Alexander TsangPoints · 4–2 · adv 3–0 · pen 0–1 · 03:00
QFKingsford Dodd def. Charbel TadrosSubmission · 0–0 · 00:10
QFJoshua Sooho Moon def. Matthew YounesSubmission · 0–0 · 00:26
SFLeonidas Materac def. John SimitsiotisSubmission · 2–0 · 01:33
SFKingsford Dodd def. Joshua Sooho MoonSubmission · 0–0 · 00:30
FKingsford Dodd def. Leonidas MateracSubmission · 0–0 · 00:01

The full record for this division →

All 93 divisions recorded from this event, and every bracket before it →

Advance notice · Ju-Jitsu at the Asian Games, Nagoya, 1–3 October

The Record · Asia

Ju-jitsu is on the programme of the Aichi–Nagoya 2026 Asian Games, at the Aichi Prefectural Martial Arts Hall in Nagoya, from Thursday 1 to Saturday 3 October. Eight gold medals and sixteen bronzes, decided over three days in one hall. It is the only grappling competition of the year that this region contests as national teams under a multi-sport federation, and this paper intends to record all eight divisions: every bracket, every placing, every name as the organiser enters it.

It is there because West Asia put it there. The Olympic Council of Asia let each of its five geographic zones nominate one sport for these Games on the strength of its popularity in that zone. West Asia nominated ju-jitsu; Central Asia nominated kurash. A sport does not arrive on this programme by growing. It arrives by being chosen, by a bloc, in a room.

DayDivisions and draw as scheduledMedals
Thu 1 OctMen −62kg and −69kg from 09:00 · Women −48kg from 12:15 · men's −69kg opens at a round of 64, the only division in the programme that does15:30–16:20
Fri 2 OctMen −77kg and −94kg from 09:00 · Women −52kg from 10:55 · each opens at a round of 3214:30–15:20
Sat 3 OctMen −85kg and Women −63kg from 09:00 · each opens at a round of 3213:00–13:25
VenueAichi Prefectural Martial Arts Hall (Aichi Budokan), Nagoya — every contest of all three days1–3 Oct
PodiumTwo bronze contests in every division, A and B — eight golds, eight silvers, sixteen bronzes32 medals
RulesSubmission, or the higher score from throws, mount, back control and other positional advantage — neither IBJJF nor ADCCOn the day
EligibilityAsian NOCs only — Australia and New Zealand do not compete at these Games—
The nameThe organising committee spells it Jiu Jitsu; the international federation and the competition programme spell it Ju-Jitsu. We follow the programme and record the variance.Read 28 Sep

Dates, sessions, venue, draw sizes and the medal structure are read from the Games' own results system on 28 September 2026, three days before the first contest, and not from any secondary account. No result exists yet; nothing here is a prediction. A result from Nagoya will not be tabled beside a result from a Pan Pacific or an ADCC event — the ruleset is a different sport wearing the same word. The eight brackets go to permanent addresses as they close.

What we still cannot settle

Open questions · carried until answered

Whether the open-weight prize was paid. One division met the published condition of eight competitors. Seven did not, and two of the advertised belts drew no open-weight division at all. What was paid, to whom, and on what reading of the condition, is not published anywhere we can find. We are putting the question to the organiser and will record the answer here, in place.

Which ju-jitsu is being contested in Nagoya. The Asian Games programme names eight weight divisions and no discipline. Ju-jitsu's international federation runs several — ne-waza, fighting system, duo, show — and they are not the same contest. The organising committee's description of how a bout is won matches ne-waza, but a description is not a designation, and no page we can find on the official sites names the discipline. We are asking, and will record the answer here.

Who is actually entered at Nagoya. The results system lists the full draw as scheduled — a round of 32 in seven divisions and a round of 64 in one — but publishes no ju-jitsu entry list three days out. Until it does, how much of each draw is a contest and how much is a bye is not knowable, and this paper will not estimate it from the size of a bracket.

Seventeen divisions with no placings. The brackets closed and the finals are recorded, but the organiser published no placing table for them. We will not infer third places from the shape of a draw. If the placings are published later, they go in at the same addresses, dated.

The Corner · Editorial

Ninety-three brackets now exist in two places. That is the whole job.

The Cornerman Editor · Melbourne · 28 September 2026

Until this weekend, the public record of the Wollongong kids divisions existed in exactly one place: an event page inside a commercial tournament platform that nobody has promised to keep.

That is not a criticism of the platform, which does its work well, or of the organiser, who paid for it. An event page serves a weekend. When the weekend is over it has done what it was built to do. Nothing in that arrangement is a promise to a nine-year-old that the bracket with her name in it will still be reachable when she is nineteen. Accounts lapse. Platforms reorganise. Events come down, and no one is at fault when they do.

As of tonight the same ninety-three brackets also exist at ninety-three addresses this paper controls — plain, dated, citable, and corrected in place rather than replaced. There is no commentary in them. They are a copy. The copy is the product.

Which puts an obligation on this desk that is worth printing, because a record held in one more place is still one failure away from the same problem. So the addresses are readable by a person, the index is a file, the underlying data is plain JSON in a public repository, and anyone at all may take the lot and keep their own copy without asking us. If this paper stops, the record should not stop with it.

We would rather the organisers held it themselves, permanently and publicly, and we will say so every week that they do not. Until somebody does, holding the copy is ours to do, and it is not a favour to the sport. It is the reason the paper exists.

Corrections

Standing log · § 4.1

27 October 2026 — this issue's headline and its central claim are wrong. The Wollongong kids record does say how every contest was won. The organiser published a method, a score and a time for all 186 contests. The bracket page draws only the names; the rest is in the match data the same page loads, and this desk read the drawing and missed the data. The figure "0 with a method on the record" should read 186 of 186: 107 by submission, 70 on points, 3 by referee decision, 3 no-shows, 2 disqualifications and 1 walkover. Every Wollongong division in the register now carries the organiser's method, score and time. The text below is left as it was published, as § 4.2 requires. — The Cornerman

28 September 2026 — Vol. 1 No. 4, The Record. The number of competitors in the kids divisions was published as 195. A recount over all ninety-three published brackets gives 196. The figure is corrected in the standing box, the opening paragraph and the record table. The original number is recorded here.

28 September 2026 — Vol. 1 No. 4, The Record. The table row Decided by one match was published as 37, with a note saying it included the seven unopposed divisions. Both parts were wrong. Forty-two brackets were settled by a single contested match, and the seven unopposed divisions contained no match at all. They are now two separate rows, and a third row records the two divisions run as round-robins.

28 September 2026 — Vol. 1 No. 4, The Record, heading. The record section was headed as the brackets now stand, which reads as though the draw were still open. The results were final before publication. The heading now reads as the brackets closed.

28 September 2026 — Vol. 1 No. 4, The Corner, production. In the first build of this issue the editorial column was laid out with class names the stylesheet does not carry, and the section rendered as an empty block for anyone who read the page before it was rebuilt the same day. No text was lost and none was changed in the fix. It is logged because what a reader received is part of the record.

How this was checked

The brackets and placings for the kids divisions are taken from the organiser's published brackets on Smoothcomp, read on 28 September 2026 after the event, when every bracket in those divisions was marked finished. The entry list is taken from the same event page, read on 21 September 2026 after late registration closed.

The figures for entries at close (136 kids divisions, 235 entries, 79 of them holding one child) are counted from the entry list as read on 21 September. The figures for the day (93 brackets, 213 places, 196 competitors, 27 byes, 186 matches, 42 brackets settled by one match, 7 with none, 2 run as round-robins, 76 placing tables) are counted from the ninety-three bracket files published with this issue, not transcribed from a summary. Anyone may recount them from the same files.

The Nagoya advance notice is taken from the Aichi–Nagoya 2026 organising committee's sport and venue pages and the published ju-jitsu competition programme, read on 28 September 2026. No result from those Games is recorded in this issue, because none had been decided when it went out.

The absence of methods is a statement about the published record, not about what happened on the mats. We checked every one of the 93 kids brackets: no method, time or score appears against any match. Where a bracket recorded an automatic advance we have entered it as a bye rather than a win.

The prize-money terms are quoted from the organiser's own event page as published before the event, including the minimum of eight competitors. The division sizes are taken from the published brackets on the day of the event.

Scope. This week's register covers the kids divisions only — Mighty Mite, Pee Wee, Junior and Teen. Juvenile, adult and master divisions from the same event are not recorded here and are not counted in any figure above.